Skip to content

Reason for Lengthy Return of Physical Controls (Buttons) in Modern Vehicles by Automakers

Automakers are finally grasping the preference among drivers for tangible buttons over digital controls. One might wonder, what caused the delay in this realization?

Cars' Design Delay: Reintroduction of Physical Buttons Proving Sluggish for Automakers
Cars' Design Delay: Reintroduction of Physical Buttons Proving Sluggish for Automakers

Reason for Lengthy Return of Physical Controls (Buttons) in Modern Vehicles by Automakers

In the ever-evolving world of automotive technology, a significant shift is underway in the design of car dashboards. This transformation, driven primarily by customer preferences, aims to strike a balance between all-touchscreen and all-physical interfaces.

The move towards all-digital interfaces in cars began in earnest with Tesla and its Model S, which debuted in the early 2010s. However, as cars have become increasingly complex, there is a growing need for touch interfaces and software menus to manage the myriad of features now available.

Recent research has shown that almost 50% of survey respondents think vehicles display too much content on screens, finding it unsafe. This sentiment is driving a shift towards a more reasonable solution to the industry's interface challenges.

The development costs of displays have significantly decreased over time, making them a cost-effective alternative to rows of toggles or buttons. Some automakers have opted for screens on dashboards instead of traditional controls due to this cost-effectiveness.

However, the auto industry is learning a valuable lesson: customers prefer physical buttons. Automakers like Volkswagen, Hyundai, and Mercedes-Benz have announced plans to reintroduce physical buttons in their cars due to customer feedback about touchscreen-only interfaces causing stress and annoyance.

Tesla, with its unique position of developing products from scratch, benefited from a screen-first cabin due to the absence of physical buttons in its parts list. Yet, even Tesla recognised the need for a balance, as S&P AutoIntelligence Associate Director Stephanie Brinley pointed out, stating that the reduction in components was also a factor in Tesla's decision.

The pendulum is swinging back towards a balance between all-touch and all-physical interfaces. For instance, Volkswagen declined to put a steering wheel with real buttons in the Golf R due to the expense and time-consuming nature of the process.

It's important to note that tariff situations and shifting landscapes in the auto industry have impacted profit margins. The auto industry operates on mid-single-digit profit margins, unlike tech companies like Apple. As a result, cost-related factors have played a significant role in the industry's interface decisions.

Changes to car dashboards take time due to long product lifecycles in the auto industry. Despite automakers having evidence for a long time that their customers prefer physical buttons, the shift towards a balanced interface is a gradual process.

In conclusion, the shift towards a more balanced approach in car dashboard interfaces is a response to customer preferences and the need for cost-effectiveness. As the auto industry continues to evolve, we can expect to see a continued swing towards a balance between all-touch and all-physical interfaces.

Read also:

Latest