Market specialists analyze reasons behind ALPACA's astronomical 1,000% surge, questioning potential market manipulation.
Rampant Rally in ALPACA Defies Gravity After Binance Delisting Announcement
In a baffling turn of events, Alpaca Finance (ALPACA) has seen an astounding quadruple-digit price surge over the past week following Binance's delisting announcement. This counterintuitive market behavior has sparked intense debate among analysts and traders, with many pointing fingers at potential market manipulation.
Why is ALPACA Soaring Despite Binance's Delisting Decision?
Usually, a Binance listing serves as a bullish signal for tokens, boosting prices due to increased visibility and liquidity. However, recent trends suggest a stark reversal of this pattern.
On April 24, Binance announced the delisting of four tokens, including ALPACA. While the value of the remaining tokens dropped, ALPACA's price skyrocketed. BeInCrypto data reveals that the token appreciated by over 1,000% over the past seven days.
Despite the initial momentum, ALPACA's price has dipped by 34.5% in the past day, trading at $0.55 as of this writing. Yet, the token's unusual rise has caught the attention of market watchers.
"ALPACA is the most blatant crypto manipulation I've witnessed recently. How do you push a token from 0.02 to 0.3, sell it back to 0.07, and then pump it from 0.07 to 1.27 only to bring it back down to 0.3?" a user wrote.
Analyst Budhil Vyas labeled it a "textbook liquidity hunting." He explained that large market players, or whales, initially drove the price down by 80%, triggering a panic and resulting in mass liquidations. Then, just before the 2-hour delisting deadline, they rapidly pumped the price by 15X.
Vyas believes this move was strategic, aiming to squeeze liquidity from the market. These whales were desperate to secure positions before the asset was removed from the exchange. He underscored that no genuine accumulation was taking place.
According to Vyas, the price surge was tactical, designed to drain whatever liquidity was left in the market.
"This is crypto in 2025. Stay vigilant," Vyas advised.
Trade Crypto Futures with Plus500- 0% Commission Bonus - Claim up to $200 in rebates.- Fast & Secure Trading - Execute trades effortlessly.- Stay Ahead of the Market - Capitalize on Bitcoin's volatility.
Try Plus500 Today!
Meanwhile, Johannes provided a detailed analysis of the mechanics behind such price manipulations. In the latest X (formerly Twitter) post, he elaborated that shrewd parties take advantage of the low liquidity that typically follows delisting announcements.
The strategy involves acquiring a large portion of the token's supply. Traders then take significant positions in perpetual futures, betting on the token's price increasing, as these contracts offer greater liquidity than spot markets.
They then buy the token on the spot market, increasing demand and price. With most of the supply controlled, there is minimal selling pressure, allowing the price to soar. Once the delisting occurs, the perpetual futures positions are forced to close with minimal slippage, enabling traders to lock in substantial profits.
DeFi analyst Ignas weighed in on the situation, stating that this pattern has been observed before, particularly during delisting announcements on the South Korean exchange Upbit. In fact, he noted that delistings used to garner similar, if not more, attention from speculators as new listings in the country.
"A delisting window requires stopping deposits, so with an inflow of new tokens restricted, degens pump the price to get the last hurrah before an inevitable dump," he wrote.
Ignas referenced Bitcoin Gold (BTG) as an example, whose price increased by 112% after Upbit announced its delisting, demonstrating that this price-pumping behavior persists.
These instances have led to debate about whether the "pump-delist" trend is becoming more common. As the crypto market evolves, these manipulative practices underscore the urgent need for research, increased vigilance, and stronger regulatory oversight to protect investors from predatory strategies.
Uphold | eToro | Plus500 | Coinbase | MoonacyUphold | eToro | Plus500 | Coinbase | Moonacy
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is dedicated to providing unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Insights from Enrichment Data:
- Deposit Restrictions: Exchanges halt deposits during delistings, limiting new token supply.
- Artificial Scarcity: Reduced selling pressure allows traders to coordinate buy-ins, driving up prices.
- Dump Phase: Early buyers sell their holdings at inflated prices to late entrants, leaving retail investors with devalued tokens.
- Historical Precedent: Bitcoin Gold (BTG) rose 112% after Upbit's delisting announcement, showing the ongoing pattern.
- Market Maker Role: Some firms may manipulate prices through wash trading and timed sell-offs, as seen with Movement Labs' MOVE token and other instances involving Jump Crypto/DWF Labs.
- Regulatory Concerns: Recent lawsuits, such as Wintermute and CLS Global, highlight regulators' focus on prosecuting wash trading and market manipulation during these events.
- Despite Binance delisting Alpaca Finance (ALPACA), the token's price unexpectedly soared over the past week, causing market debate and concerns of manipulation.
- Traditionally, a Binance listing boosts token prices due to increased visibility and liquidity, but recent trends suggest a reverse pattern.
- On April 24, Binance announced the delisting of four tokens, including ALPACA, yet ALPACA's price skyrocketed, appreciating over 1,000% in the past seven days.
- Analyst Budhil Vyas labeled ALPACA's price surge as a "textbook liquidity hunting," where large market players or whales manipulated the market to squeeze liquidity.
- Vyas explained that whales initially drove down the price, triggering mass liquidations, then rapidly pumped the price, and later brought it back down again.
- DeFi analyst Ignas noted that this pattern has been observed before, particularly during delisting announcements on the South Korean exchange Upbit, where delistings attracted significant attention from speculators.
- Ignas pointed out that deposit restrictions during delistings create artificial scarcity, allowing traders to coordinate buy-ins and drive up prices before a dump phase.
- He referenced Bitcoin Gold (BTG) as an example, whose price increased by 112% after Upbit announced its delisting, demonstrating the persistence of this price-pumping behavior.
- As the crypto market evolves, growing concerns about manipulative practices highlight the need for increased vigilance and stronger regulatory oversight to protect investors.
- In 2025, it is crucial to remain vigilant and aware of counterintuitive market behavior in the ongoing development of technology, finance, and investing, particularly in the cryptocurrency market.
