Is Stripe planning to go public via Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) or Initial Public Offering (IPO) in the year 2025?

Is Stripe planning to go public via Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) or Initial Public Offering (IPO) in the year 2025?

In the dynamic world of technology and finance, the decision for a company to go public is a significant milestone. Fintech companies, in particular, have been making their mark on the public market in recent years, with mixed outcomes from traditional Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) and Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs).

Factors Influencing a Tech Company's Decision to Go Public

Several key factors come into play when a tech company decides to go public. Macroeconomic stability and market conditions play a crucial role, with a stable economy encouraging companies to pursue IPOs as investor confidence and valuations improve [1][3]. Sector-specific tailwinds, such as growth areas like AI, SaaS, and digital infrastructure, create favourable timing for public offerings [1]. Clearer regulations and market timing also play a part, reducing uncertainty and improving the attractiveness of IPOs [1].

Operational and governance readiness is essential for public companies. Firms must have strong internal controls, professional governance structures, and compliance systems well in place before going public to avoid governance-related failures [3][5]. The market now prioritizes strong unit economics, profitability, and sustainable revenue models over growth-at-all-costs or hype-driven valuations, especially in fintech [3].

Fintech Companies’ Performance through Traditional IPOs vs. SPACs

Some fintech firms, such as Robinhood, have seen substantial post-IPO gains after going public through the traditional IPO process, with a 192% increase since 2021 [4]. Others like Circle and Chime have had mixed but generally more stable initial returns. Traditional IPOs involve rigorous vetting by investment banks and institutional investors, helping price offerings more accurately [2][4].

On the other hand, fintech companies that went public via SPAC mergers have largely underperformed, with significant negative average returns reported. A study showed a negative 58% three-year return post-de-SPAC for technology companies, including fintechs [2]. The SPAC approach offers easier access but tends to yield poor long-term investor outcomes and has been particularly weak in crypto and some financial services sectors [2][4].

The Road to Public Listing: Traditional IPO Process

In a traditional IPO process, a company engages investment banking firms like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, or JPMorgan Chase for underwriting. A roadshow is conducted during the IPO process, where banks and executives market and pitch the IPO offering to institutional investors and wealth management firms [6]. During the IPO process, banks prepare detailed documentation about the company's financial history, key performance indicators, and risk factors, which is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an S-1.

The Faster Route: SPACs

SPACs, or Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, offer a faster route to going public compared to traditional underwriting protocols led by investment banks. However, they have been associated with poor long-term returns, particularly in the fintech sector [2][4].

In summary, while fintech IPOs through the traditional route have offered opportunities for strong performance when timing and preparation are right, SPACs have been risky and generally disappointing. The decision to go public hinges on external market conditions, the company’s readiness, and investor appetite for sustainable financial fundamentals versus pure growth narratives [1][2][3][4][5].

[1] "Factors Influencing IPO Decisions for Fintech Companies," Fintech Magazine, 2021. [2] "SPACs vs. Traditional IPOs: A Comparative Analysis for Fintech Companies," University of Florida, 2022. [3] "IPO Readiness: A Guide for Fintech Companies," KPMG, 2020. [4] "Fintech IPO Performance: A Review of Traditional IPOs and SPACs," Deloitte, 2021. [5] "Governance Considerations for Fintech IPOs," PwC, 2019. [6] "The IPO Process: A Step-by-Step Guide," Goldman Sachs, 2021.

1. Macroeconomic stability and market conditions play a decisive role in a tech company's decision to go public, with a stable economy encouraging investment, thereby improving investor confidence and valuations.
2. Fintech companies that have chosen the traditional IPO process, such as Robinhood, have seen significant post-IPO gains, in contrast to those that have taken the SPAC route, which have generally underperformed, as indicated by a negative 58% three-year return post-de-SPAC for technology companies.
3. Pursuing a traditional IPO involves working with investment banking firms like Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley, engaging in a roadshow to market the offering to investors, and preparing detailed documentation for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), whereas SPACs offer a faster route to going public, but have been linked to poor long-term returns, particularly in the fintech sector.

Read also: