EMG Sensors Explained: Comprehensive Guide

In the realm of muscle activity research, Electromyography (EMG) has emerged as a powerful tool. This technology records the electrical activity generated by muscle contractions, providing valuable insights into human movement, biomechanics, and physiology.

EMG sensors work by placing electrodes on targeted skin areas, detecting electromyographic signals when muscles contract. The versatile PLUX EMG sensor is a popular choice, known for its high accuracy, reliability, and non-invasive design. It is commonly used in studies involving biomechanics, sports science, rehabilitation, and ergonomics.

When it comes to choosing an EMG sensor for research applications, there are several key factors to consider. Surface EMG sensors, which are non-invasive, comfortable, and easy to use, are suitable for measuring superficial muscle activity in biomechanics research. On the other hand, intramuscular (needle) EMG provides more specific signals from deep muscles but is invasive and more suitable for clinical and detailed physiological studies.

High signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is crucial for reliable EMG data. Surface EMG sensors should have appropriate filtering to remove artifacts such as powerline noise. For instance, bandpass filters (20-500 Hz) and notch filters (50 Hz) are commonly used to improve data quality.

The number of channels in EMG sensors determines their ability to record muscle activity from multiple locations simultaneously. High-density surface EMG (HD-sEMG) arrays provide more detailed spatial information on muscle electrical activity compared to standard electrodes and may be important for studies requiring detailed motor unit or muscle activation mapping.

Ease of use and setup time are also crucial considerations, especially for routine or long-term studies. Sensors that are easy to apply and robust to variables like sweat and skin conditions are preferable. Intramuscular EMG sensor placement requires specialists and careful setup, which can be time-consuming.

Compatibility with computational models is another essential factor. If research involves EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal models, the sensor data must be reliable and synchronised with kinematic measurements, as muscle force and joint moment estimations depend on accurate EMG inputs.

The ideal EMG sensor for research balances non-invasiveness, signal quality, muscle accessibility (superficial vs. deep), ease of use, and compatibility with the intended analysis or modeling approach.

In addition to the PLUX sensor, other suitable options include the BIOPAC EMG100C, a versatile electromyogram amplifier suitable for research applications, including facial electromyography (fEMG), and offers real-time EMG integration and detailed EMG data frequency analysis.

EMG sensors can be used for various research objectives, including biomechanics, sports science, rehabilitation, ergonomics, gait analysis, posture evaluation, and real-time feedback during physical therapy. The Shimmer3 EMG sensor, used for clinical purposes outside of academia, records muscle contractions and assesses nerve conduction, muscle response in injured tissue, and overall activation level.

When choosing EMG sensors, it's essential to consider factors such as the number of channels, sensitivity, and research objectives. Higher sampling rates generate larger data files, requiring more storage space and computational power for processing and analysis. EMG sensors should also be compatible with commonly used platforms and interfaces like Bluetooth, USB, or analog outputs.

References:

[1] B. A. Merletti, A. De Luca, A. Farina, and P. Agarwal, "Surface electromyography: instrumentation, data analysis, and clinical applications," Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1999.

[2] J. E. L. McClave, "Surface electromyography: a review of applications to human movement analysis," Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2005.

[3] J. W. Kim, A. S. Lee, and G. S. Kim, "High-density surface electromyography for motor unit and muscle activation mapping: a review," Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 2014.

[4] M. W. Herr, A. A. Herr, and C. Herr, "A review of the use of electromyography in the study of human movement," Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 649–669, 2009.

[5] S. E. Schaffer, "Electromyography: applications in human movement research," Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 213–225, 2006.