Skip to content

Consultation Conducted on the Proposed Directive for Personal Data Protection

In 2024, more than 6000 complaints lodged against the misuse of databases by the police. It was found that the state prosecutor's KI facial recognition and Kotti-Wache's video surveillance were operating illegally.

In 2024, the Data Protection Officer received over 6000 complaints. It's alleged that the police...
In 2024, the Data Protection Officer received over 6000 complaints. It's alleged that the police misused databases. The use of AI facial recognition by the prosecutor's office and video surveillance at the Kotti-Wache are said to be illegal.

Consultation Conducted on the Proposed Directive for Personal Data Protection

In 2024, Berlin faced a surge in data protection complaints, with a record-breaking total of over 6,000 complaints handled by the city's data protection officer, Meike Kamp. This government official has led the office since 2022, and a significant portion of the fines issued involved police officers who misused personal data.

Kamp's concerns extended beyond private data misuse by police officers. The report, encompassing 200 pages and publicly accessible, also highlighted the illegal use of artificial intelligence and the video surveillance at the police station at Kottbusser Tor in Kreuzberg.

The police station, located on a bridge crossing Adalbertstraße, is equipped with multiple cameras. These cameras survey not only the entrance area but also the underpass, pedestrian path, and street. Kamp stated that the video surveillance "takes place without sufficient legal basis," interfering disproportionately with the fundamental rights of passers-by and participants in traffic.

The surveillance of the pedestrian terrace, which houses counseling facilities, raises particular concerns. Kamp expressed the opinion that those seeking help should not be forced to expose themselves to video surveillance.

Polygraph tests, conducted on police officers, revealed instances of officers accessing and even using personal data from third parties for private purposes. One example involves an officer who queried a case in which he was a suspect to manipulate the proceedings. Another officer used the database to obtain a private contact number of a victim. In a third case, an officer secure a public figure's address, who later received threatening letters from third parties. The data protection office could not establish a connection in the last-mentioned case.

The senate is currently addressing the issue of domestic violence protection, having made progress in implementing measures to better protect women. On the other hand, concerns have been raised about the unrestricted restrictions on fundamental rights as the black-red coalition drives these measures forward. Meanwhile, the GdP spokesman believes that the technical possibilities related to data collection should not be hindered without proper consideration for the challenges of modern law enforcement.

These developments underscore ongoing debates about the privacy vs. safety balance, data protection compliance, and public trust concerning police surveillance practices in Berlin and beyond. The challenges persist in striking a balance between maintaining public safety and respecting citizens' privacy rights, while adhering to data protection laws. The widespread use of digital tools and AI-powered surveillance complicates oversight and enforcement, often outpacing regulatory frameworks.

While specific data on Berlin police complaints at Kottbusser Tor in 2024 is not detailed here, the broader trend shows increasing scrutiny on data protection and a growing number of complaints and enforcement actions. The challenges regarding police misuse of data, AI, and the balance between surveillance and privacy rights persist in Germany and across Europe.

  1. The concerns of Meike Kamp, Berlin's data protection officer, extend beyond misuse of personal data by police officers to include illegal use of artificial intelligence and the video surveillance at Kottbusser Tor police station.
  2. The report issued by Kamp highlights the misuse of artificial intelligence and the video surveillance at the Kottbusser Tor police station as significant issues, affirming concerns about technology and privacy in general-news contexts.
  3. The widespread use of digital tools, AI-powered surveillance, and video cameras in public places, such as at the Kottbusser Tor police station, raises questions about cybersecurity, data-and-cloud-computing, crime-and-justice, and the balance between maintaining public safety and respecting citizens' privacy rights in today's increasingly digital society.

Read also:

    Latest