AI-reworked ending of Raanjhanaa deemed as 'robbing the movie of its core essence', asserts Dhanush
In the world of Bollywood, the re-release of the 2013 film Raanjhanaa has sparked a major controversy. The film, directed by Aanand L Rai and starring Dhanush, has been at the centre of a storm due to an AI-altered climax that replaced its original tragic ending with a happier one.
Dhanush, the lead actor, has claimed that his objections to the alteration were disregarded. He stated that the concerned parties went ahead with the AI-altered climax despite his clear objection. The director, Aanand, has also expressed discontent over the AI-altered version of the film, describing it as a "reckless takeover" that strips the work of its intent, context, and soul.
The AI-edited climax has left both Dhanush and Aanand deeply disturbed. Dhanush finds the use of AI to alter films or content deeply concerning and threatens the integrity of storytelling and the legacy of cinema. He has expressed a desire for stricter regulations on the use of AI in movies.
The re-release of Raanjhanaa with an AI-altered climax has not only disturbed Dhanush but has also sparked criticism from many others in the film fraternity. Neeraj Pande, Kabir Khan, Kanika Dhillon, Varun Grover, Renuka Shahane, and Tanuj Garg are among those who have called the decision to alter the film's climax "unethical".
The controversy has raised wider discussions about the need for stricter regulations on AI use in movies. The backlash highlights concerns about the ethical and legal boundaries of modifying films post-release using AI technology, emphasizing the protection of original creators' rights and preserving the integrity of cinematic art.
Industry debates are ongoing about how to balance technological innovation with respect for creative freedom and ownership. The controversy over the Raanjhanaa AI-edited climax is prompting calls for tighter rules on AI applications in filmmaking to prevent future unauthorized modifications and safeguard filmmakers’ creative control. Legal efforts and industry dialogue are currently underway to address these challenges.
In his statement, Dhanush shared that the re-release of Raanjhanaa is not the movie he committed to 12 years ago. He also expressed that the AI-altered ending has stripped the film of its original soul. The actor, through his statement, has made it clear that the AI-edited climax has effectively removed the very soul of the film.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of creative control and the need for clear regulations in the use of AI in cinema. As the technology continues to evolve, it is crucial to ensure that it respects and upholds the artistic vision of the creators and preserves the integrity of the cinematic art.
- The controversy surrounding the AI-altered climax of the film Raanjhanaa has sparked debates about the need for regulations in using artificial intelligence in movies and entertainment, specifically in movies and TV.
- Dhanush, the lead actor of Raanjhanaa, finds the use of AI to alter films or content deeply concerning and believes it threatens the integrity of storytelling and the legacy of cinema.
- The controversy has highlighted the need for stricter regulations on AI use in movies to protect original creators' rights, preserve the integrity of cinematic art, and uphold the artistic vision of filmmakers.
